Skip to main content

Educational conferences and social justice

Conferences and related events (symposia, unconferences, cafes, uncafes, whatever) in the field of education are notoriously exclusive spaces.

And this is still often the case when the event is about social justice issues in education. Cue Alanis.

Whether it's only white people talking decolonisation, or charging the best part of a grand to bring your research there (AdvanceHE and NET, I'm looking at you), if you're a struggling academic or student, the message is clear: this is more for 'them' and less for you.
From sexual harassment (thanks, men) to explicit and hidden disincentives and barriers to engage for carers, students, and especially those who are introverted, have low disposable income, or from Black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds (thanks, neocolonialism), equity for speakers and delegates is still a pipe dream. Or it would be a dream if organisers were conscious of it. Hold on, it could still be a dream from the subconscious, right? I don't know. Don't ask me, I'm not Fanon, Freud or Kinouani for god's sake! I'm not even Dave. Anyway, I digress.

These are just a couple of things that would make an event more inclusive to those who usually cannot afford or justify the expense, whilst also acknowledging the lack of diversity and perpetuation of privilege that these events often reinforce.

So, organisers - here we go:
1) Don't paywall research that helps to fight social injustice. Make. All. Tickets. Free. But how?

2) Hold the event online. Or, only use venues that will provide space for free in return for the good will it generates (but still put it online, with captions - subject to session type of course, where anonymity may need to apply with sensitive topics). Universities with sparkling campuses, I'm looking at you.

3) But pay all speakers. At least enough to cover expenses (do not ask for proof. Just pay them. And make the process simple and quick). But how?
4) Ask (strongly nudge) delegates to make a donation when they book their ticket. And...

5) Secure sponsorship from a business. OK that might be hard, but you're curating a whole conference! Use that energy to be creative and find a way comrade!
6) Ring-fence a percentage of tickets for the university that are hosting you. But...

7) Ensure those tickets are prioritised for students, and for fixed-term and hourly-paid staff.

8) Ensure that there is space and platform for students to hold a session, and to be on a panel/s.

9) Ensure speakers are diverse (does this even need to be said? *browses the internet quickly*. Ah yes. Yes it does need to be said. Note: this tends to happen organically if your organising team is diverse. As does not arranging offensive activities. Yes, take a look at your team.
10) Forget all that complimentary plastic crap, and the optional extras that are not really optional at all. Expensive meals? Live band? VIP access? Early bird discounts? It's a very loose definition of optional if you are counting the loose change in your pocket. Get creative, arrange something else social, free and actually optional.

11) Don't just say you have a policy on delegate/audience expectations and conditions of engagement. Enforce it. Look at what @CollectiveBarc and others do. Self-care notifications for sensitive topics, questions-not-comments, dignity in communication, prioritising the marginalised, waiting for the microphone, and centering counter-narratives and non-Western epistemologies are just some of the things needed. A strong, confident Chair who understands power dynamics is worth her weight in gold here.

12) What other areas can you consider and act on? Childcare... Live closed-captioning... Ground-floor venues... What could you offer?

I hope this is helpful. We need to love conferences and conferences need to love us. All of us.

PS. Be unashamedly anti-racist. Call-out whiteness (and other heads of the Hydra of white supremacy, like sexism) when it comes up (and it will come up...white solidarity is important here).
Please comment with your suggestions for better educational conferences.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Edutwitter, Witches and whiteness

“ The journey towards understanding structural racism still requires people of colour to prioritise white feelings. ” Reni Eddo-Lodge , Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race In the wake of UK edutwitter's # ListGate , a well-known edutweeter, Greg, published another blog piece about racism . As a fellow racialised-as-white educator, I feel obliged to take the time to address it. So I will ( again ). One of Greg's main arguments (see image) is his contention that the concept of white supremacy is flawed because its circular reasoning results in those accused of holding white advantages as guilty because of their very denial of them. In the time-honoured language of male righteousness , Greg uses the analogy of witches to demonstrate his point.  But of course, anyone who is reasonably well-read in this area knows that the in-admission of one's complicity in racism ( i.e. the inequitable distribution of power, choice, social mobility, and proximity to j

‘Structural humility’ and ‘socio-professional activism’ – adding to the equity lexicon for practitioners

[Estimated reading time: 6mins] During my research and praxis over the years I have sometimes struggled to articulate with brevity some of the fundamental characteristics that practitioners should strive to embody if they aim to contribute to positive social change in healthcare and education. This led me to proposing, in late 2021 on twitter , ‘ structural humility ’ and ‘ socio-professional activism ’ as two new terms that may contribute to thinking and action towards social justice. In this blog I explain things in a little more detail… Firstly, let’s look at this quote from a recent research paper entitled ‘ Physical pain, gender, and the state of the economy in 146 nations ’: “ Economic worry can create physical pain.. .[its level] in a nation depends on the state of the economy. Pain is high when the unemployment rate is high. That is not because of greater pain among people who lose their jobs - it extends far beyond that into wider society …[and the] increase in phys

Should We Teach Students About the Specific White Privilege of Racism? Part 1: Reckless Whiteness

Reckless Whiteness. (Part 1) A blog post entitled ‘ Should we teach school students about white privilege ?’ recently hit social media. Please take a peek before you read on. This is Part 1 of a 3-part blog post related to it. I believe it's a reckless piece, particularly in the current political climate . Ironically, it's also a textbook example of ' white privilege ', whilst writing about white privilege . For a better understanding of how white people tend to assert an opinion on racism merely as an excuse to undermine it - whilst reproducing their own whiteness - there are much better things to read than my thoughts here. But I thought it necessary to use Greg Ashman's blog piece to illustrate this, seeing as he has a strong social media platform with which teachers may be engaging. Anyway, for these reasons, that blog post will serve as the 'exhibit' for some analysis here. But more of that in just a second. Firstly, allow me to make