Skip to main content

White supremacy, the decline of community, and implications for social justice activism.

For the past half a millennia, many people racialised as white benefited from a system that, whilst preferencing them, may also have caused a decline in their sense of community. 

Community is defined here as a group of people who live in a particular area who are considered as a unit of togetherness because of their shared interests or background.
Sense of community is defined here as a caring, shared commitment to meet group members' needs; a friendly feeling that members belong in and matter to the group.

Leaving aside the probability of a more direct reason for a decline in reported sense of community specifically amongst those white people who are overtly racist and xenophobic i.e. discomfort and fear from their observation, perception, or assumptions about growth in diverse ethnic demographics and increasing multiculturalism, and the rhetoric about white minoritisation and the demonisation of the non-white / 'un-citizens' they consume from Right-wing, racist media, and their self-imposed isolation from 'others', perhaps this purported decline in togetherness might be shared to some extent by all ethnicities, due to advances in globalisation, digitisation, changes in working and living conditions, cities built and expanded in ways that inhibit engagement, and the decline of the high street amongst other factors of modern life that affect us all. 

Maybe not, or not to the same extent because a key difference for majoritised white people is that active, inclusive community building hasn't been necessary for their survival, nor their success in the past few hundred years. Whereas, community is a fundamental characteristic within indigenous communities and has been necessary for global ethnic majority groups - especially minoritised diasporas impacted by colonialism - to survive white supremacy.

The invention of whiteness meant that, even without effort or intention, white people were advantaged by selective preference, and not placed at risk or disadvantage as a consequence of their racialisation.

So, have centuries of whiteness replaced the need to sustain community for white folk? Perhaps, given whiteness served as a hidden-in-plain-sight, systemic, institutionalised safety network - an exclusionary version of 'community' designed to unfairly allocate opportunity, resource and wealth (and rationalised by the made-up pseudobiology of races).

As such, whiteness could be viewed as a capitalist, in-group sanctioned version of 'community'. Perhaps a club (like Fight Club, in that it's inherently violent and the first rule is "we don't talk about it"). Membership of this club reduced barriers to success and safety relative to non-white peers (e.g. in education, employment, property, health, and criminal justice) up to the point at which club membership might threaten the status quo of class division and labour exploitation, loosen the grip of the top-most power holders on their electorate, or begin to shift mainstream accepted norms towards the Left.

But this substitution of club for community, despite it facilitating a significant but ultimately limited material privilege (notwithstanding intersecting systemic factors such as ableism, xenophobia, homophobia, transphobia etc), has arguably eroded an authentic sense of community and with it an accessibility for shared joy. For whiteness is not just a disconnection with community, it's also a disconnection with one's own humanity as well as others', a disconnection with inner peace and a thief of joy, and a disconnection with nature.

Is white supremacist capitalism therefore implicated in the decline of friendships, friendly neighbours and neighbourhoods, extended families of 'unrelated' aunties and uncles, the local shops, the local doctor, the village that could raise us, the standing together on picket lines..?  Without white supremacy would we all be doing more collaborating with colleagues, working and sharing with students, children, patients and communities as equals? Thinking with compassion before cognition (and not sustaining a false binary between the two)? Resisting and challenging the cages of unhealthy masculinity and embracing intersectional queer feminism? Focusing on education for growth, sustainability and creativity instead of merely utility? Prioritising education over bygone eras of inherited career pathways, nepotistic networks and assumed entitlement?

Perhaps a pathway to community within and across groups could be cleared by unlearning and overstanding the legacy of colonial white supremacy and socialisation that elevates competition over collaboration, envy over celebration, separation over sharing. Would subverting whiteness and patriarchy help us join together across class and other differences in the struggle for social justice?

To do the above, and for social justice work to be impactful, one must be able to hold the following two truths at once: 

(1) social justice work targeted at the oppression of specific groups is necessary AND embracing social justice work that helps everybody regardless of identity is necessary. 

(2) change won't happen without internal work within individuals AND change won't happen without external action with others and with institutional policy/practice. 

(3) shame is one of many emotions that can motivate a change in behaviour towards accountability, advocacy and allyship (if temporary, and processed) BUT shaming, and guilt in the longer term, are unhealthy, unhelpful and lead to avoidance and resistance (or self-healing saviourism).

(4) discomfort, anger, risk, critique and challenge are necessary in social justice work BUT compassion, healing and support for all are necessary too.

(5) social justice work must be reparative praxis and not just solitary internal personal growth BUT social justice work doesn't have to be public/public-facing, and people can start wherever and with whatever they feel sufficiently confident, even if that is some solitary learning/internal growth.

(6) identity and lived experience are vital and central to social justice work BUT the empathy of shared humanity means everyone can have a voice and has the potential to understand the specific oppression of others.

(7) we all need to embrace humility and keep growing AND we all have strengths and assets already within us.


Comments are open but please, if you disagree, begin with kindness. I do not mean all white people or you specifically. I am talking about systemic oppression, structural power, culture, hegemony and the legacy of Global North colonialism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Edutwitter, Witches and whiteness

“ The journey towards understanding structural racism still requires people of colour to prioritise white feelings. ” Reni Eddo-Lodge , Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race In the wake of UK edutwitter's # ListGate , a well-known edutweeter, Greg, published another blog piece about racism . As a fellow racialised-as-white educator, I feel obliged to take the time to address it. So I will ( again ). One of Greg's main arguments (see image) is his contention that the concept of white supremacy is flawed because its circular reasoning results in those accused of holding white advantages as guilty because of their very denial of them. In the time-honoured language of male righteousness , Greg uses the analogy of witches to demonstrate his point.  But of course, anyone who is reasonably well-read in this area knows that the in-admission of one's complicity in racism ( i.e. the inequitable distribution of power, choice, social mobility, and proximity to j...

Moving our bodies - Moving for mental health

  Moving our bodies - Moving for mental health Michael Cole, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, and The Society of Sports Therapists (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-4131-9566)   In celebration of Mental Health Awareness Week (13 th to 19 th May), and the Mental Health Foundation’s theme of ‘Moving my body - Moving for my mental health’, here’s a short blog post that’s part personal and part political. Movement is my primary love language. For me, simply changing my body position whilst sitting in my office chair is self-care. Engaging in exercise is one of the best presents I gift to my body and to my mental health almost every day. But there are tensions within exercise. In this blog piece I take a brief look at two of these. Tension 1: Exercise is great, but it’s personal – why aren’t you moving more? On the one hand, we know that the health benefits of exercise benefit everybody; on the other hand, an individual’s relationship with the act of exercis...

‘Structural humility’ and ‘socio-professional activism’ – adding to the equity lexicon for practitioners

[Estimated reading time: 6mins] During my research and praxis over the years I have sometimes struggled to articulate with brevity some of the fundamental characteristics that practitioners should strive to embody if they aim to contribute to positive social change in healthcare and education. This led me to proposing, in late 2021 on twitter , ‘ structural humility ’ and ‘ socio-professional activism ’ as two new terms that may contribute to thinking and action towards social justice. In this blog I explain things in a little more detail… Firstly, let’s look at this quote from a recent research paper entitled ‘ Physical pain, gender, and the state of the economy in 146 nations ’: “ Economic worry can create physical pain.. .[its level] in a nation depends on the state of the economy. Pain is high when the unemployment rate is high. That is not because of greater pain among people who lose their jobs - it extends far beyond that into wider society …[and the] increase in phys...